I have had a comment from 'anothernorthernjp' re the post 'Three of a kind revisited', taking issue with the type of GoogleAds which are appearing at the moment. I have published the comment in full, under that post. The ads which appear are determined by Google and cover a range of topics. I take his point about the ads accompanying my recent focus on motoring offences, and having met Mr Freeman professionally on more than one occasion do not always care for his approach. Nevertheless, the service offered is legal and any defendant is entitled to have professional assistance in presenting his case. This may include 'technicalities', but it may also include such matters as special reasons not to endorse or disqualify, argument of exceptional hardship, legitimate but complex legal defences to the charge, the need to call expert testimony, etc.
Whether a defendant avails him/herself of such services, I shall continue to hear and decide the case on its merits.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Adverts?
I use Mozilla with adblockplus... I dont get any adverts....
JUNK IE ... and use ad block it rocks
Why is it a problem for anyone - particluarly magistrates - that Freemans solicitors should advertise on this blog site? As long as they are members of the Law Society and they conform to rules on advertising they contribute to the cost of prooviding the blog. Nick Freeman does his job well for his clients according to what the law allows. Those people who dissaprove of this do not understand the English judicial system
Post a Comment